ORLY Energy Group LLC, 20 Island Ave. - 510, 
	Miami Beach, FL, 33139   800.962.0590

.lftr - beginnings.

Paul Genoa, director of policy development at the Nuclear Energy Institute is quoted as saying:

"There's a huge investment and infrastructure in this country that goes back 50 years.
You don't just walk away from that and try the shiny new toy, even if the shiny new
toy might work better."


The huge investment Genoa is referring to are today's nuclear power plants classified as Light Water Reactors ( LWR ), and the "shiny new toy" is marvelous variation on that technology created in the late 1960's at Oak Ridge National Laboratory utilizing a revolutionary medium liquid salts. (MSR) The salts that were used at Oak Ridge are not table salt, but a Fluoride Salt, and the reactor they operated in is called a Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR pronounced LiFTeR). Most people equate salts with table salt, which in its present state is a solid, in crystal form. Other salts, namely Fluoride Salts posses the same qualities as table salts, and are in fact, frozen liquids. To put that into perspective, these salts freeze at approximately 450*c. At 451*c, these Fluoride salts retain many of the same characteristics as water, and flow freely as such.

Genoa's use of the words "might work better" does not do the LFTR justice, and is misleading. In the 1950's, Adm. Hyman Rickover was tasked for building the solid-fuel uranium reactor's that would power the Nautilus, America's first nuclear-powered submarine. In the meantime, Alvin Weinberg and other scientists at Oak Ridge were designing a strategic bomber powered by a tiny, 3-foot-diameter molten-salt reactor. The atomic bomber never flew, but the research was a complete success.

Research on molten-salt technology continued until 1969, when it was, basically, put on the shelf, where it remains to today. The reasons for this had little to to do with the brilliance, safety, and simplicity of the reactor design, but were based upon numerous political factors of the day. Knowing that this MSR reactor had performed flawlessly for a combined run time of 22,000 hours, makes this fact all the less palatable. Had MSR technology been chosen in the 1950's as the primary path to providing energy for the future, there is no chance that today there would be a groundswell of people like me and many others advocating a change to solid-fuel reactors. The thorium community recognizes that the continuing disaster at Fukushima, Japan, is the wake-up call for a change in technology going forward, and we believe that it should be MSR-LFTR technology.

.lftr vs. lwr.

Since Fukushima, many questions have been asked about the safety of today's Light Water Reactors's or LWR's. As the name implies, these types of reactors incorporate water of some sort into their overall design, almost exclusively in the form of coolant for the uranium fuel rods, and as an engine to turn a steam generator to produce electricity. LFTR's use a completely different medium for coolant, and that medium is molten salts, in this case molten Fluoride salts.

LWR
 
LFTR
Highly Enriched uranium
Operating Fuel
Thorium
Water / Heavy Water
Operating Medium
Molten Fluoride Salt / Liquid Fluoride
Under Intense Atmospheric Pressure
Operating Pressure
Normal to slightly negative air pressure
Produces Plutonium as a by product
Proliferation Aspect
Proliferation Resistant, does NOT produce Plutonium
24,500 year storage of highly radioactive waste
Waste
10 year toxicity, 300 year storage
About 1 shipping container per annum
Amount of Waste
Approximately a 3x3x3 box
Less than 5%
Operating Efficiency
Up to 98%
No Built in Safety Features
Safety
Passively Cooled
    Walk away Safe
    "Drain Plug" in case of unexpected mishap
    Iodine and Cesium BIND to the fluorides, eliminating their release into the atmosphere

.lftr - benefits.

As director of policy development for the NEI, Genoa should welcome, rather than pooh-pooh, a frank discussion of our ideas. Let me count the ways TMSR is superior to current solid fuel reactors:

  1. Molten-salt reactors burn thorium, an element three to four times more abundant than uranium. America has already enough to power the country for centuries.
  2. TMSR fuel is a mixture of nuclear fuel and very hot molten fluoride salts, a liquid like water. TMSR cannot melt down because it already operates in a molten state.
  3. TMSR operates practically at living-room pressure. Solid-fuel reactors operate at thousands of pounds of pressure, hence their huge, expensive containment structures.
  4. TMSR is "walk-away" safe. If anything goes wrong, even with no power or personnel, it will shut itself down automatically.
  5. TMSR is over 99 percent efficient and can be refueled while it is making electricity. Its long-term waste is measured in pounds, not tons, and is harmless in about 300 years, not 300 centuries.
  6. TMSR's are small, modular and can be manufactured on an assembly line, loaded on trucks, taken where they are needed and practically plugged in.
  7. TMSR does not contribute to proliferation, and terrorists won't care.
  8. TMSR emits no greenhouse gases or other environmental pollutants.
I was privileged to address the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future in Washington May 13. I praised Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander's "Blue Print for 100 New Nuclear Reactors in 20 Years," but I lamented that he calls for more solid-fuel reactors. Genoa should join with Alexander and the thorium community to take a close look at the "shiny new toy" that is TMSR. It satisfies every wish in the senator's blueprint better than any other technology in existence. In his plan, Alexander asks rhetorically, "Isn't it time we got back in the game?" The Chinese have already answered that question. Their answer is TMSR. What will ours be?

.lftr - design.

The design of a LFTR is practically a misnomer in the sense that the majority of the plant and production facility can and should be constructed below grade. This design specification allows the installation of additional passive fail safe measures, including the ability to passively cool the reactant's should an unforeseen catastrophe occur. Secondly, moving the plant’s construction below grade allows for a compact and efficient operational design with offices, processing centers and access all above grade. The reduction in surface area will allow for the planting of additional green coverage to offset and reduce the ambient local air and ground temperature, and provide additional aesthetic value to the overall concept. The design below is a general rendering, but we see the above grounds maintaining the same influenced design and architecture so relevant throughout the surrounding areas, with a cutting edge sprinkling of today’s modernism influence.
ORLY Energy Group LLC - LFTR deign

.lftr - secondary revenue streams.

.contact us.

ORLY Energy Group LLC
20 Island Ave - Suite 510
Miami Beach, FL, 33139
800.962.0590

Your Name:

Your Email:



Attention:


Mail Message: